Pope launches mission to re-evangelise the West

Pope Benedict XVI has created a new office to "re-evangelise" the Western world in an attempt to roll back secularist advances in what the Vatican sees as the traditional heartland of Christendom.

The Pope has made no secret of his dislike for secularism and has been determined to persuade Western countries to rediscover their Catholic roots. He has frequently railed against some of the key pillars of secular liberalism such as the acceptance of homosexuality and abortion rights and the use of contraception.

At one of the last vespers' service before the Vatican shuts down for the summer break, the Pope announced the creation of a Pontifical Council for the promotion of New Evangelisation which would be dedicated to what he described as "a grave crisis in the sense of the Christian faith".

Read the Article

New Threats to Freedom

Back in 2005, Chris Lee, a student at Washington State University, set out to make a comedy musical that, in the tradition of South Park, offended as broad a spectrum of people as possible. Unfortunately for him, he succeeded. His musical--a very loose parody of Mel Gibson's 2004 film The Passion of the Christ--earned him protests, death threats, and even an organized attempt among administrators and students to disrupt the play.

Today, my organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, unveils a new video about Chris' strange journey:

You can see all the documentation about this case yourself here, including the e-mail in which the Washington State University administrator admits that they counseled students to stand up and yell during the play. While the university did not advise the students to shout threats of physical violence and even death threats during the play, that's what the protesters did. Meanwhile, the campus police told Chris they would not protect the actors if the angry protesters decided to rush the stage. Amazingly, the president of WSU actually praised the university-funded, threat-shouting, play-disrupting students, saying they "exercised their rights of free speech in a very responsible manner."

Read the Article

Tina Anderson, 15, Punished by Baptists for Being Raped

Another sad story about Religious officials abusing their power for their desires to take advantage of an innocent child and their attempts to cover it up.

Tina Anderson was raped and impregnated at the age of 15 by a member of her church. After reporting the crime to her pastor, however, it was Anderson who was punished.

Here are some of the culprits of this story:

The Catholic Church's HR
Until the Church gets with it and starts proper screening for PEDOPHILES, rather than gay men, we're simply gonna have to hold it's hiring practices responsible for creating such ginormous loop holes.

Richard Rushton
That's when authorities raided Rushton's home and discovered that, as Lance had suspected, Rushton wasn't filming sermons, but was videotaping up the skirts of girls and women in attendance.

Jeff and Jeremiah Owens
Owens recently made headlines when a YouTube video of one his sermons surfaced in which he says, "we need to stop burning flags and start burning fags. We need a hunt-a-homo week. We need to take 'em all out and shoot 'em with a scatter shotgun."

Harley Michael Keough
Last week, six different women took the stand and testified that upon arriving at the church's food bank, they were greeted by an overly friendly Keough who would lead them into the food bank's storage room, and then promptly molest them.

Trinity Baptist Church
Speaking of religious leaders who turn a blind eye to rape -- we now bring you to the tale of the Trinity Baptist Church in Concord, New Hampshire.


What a very very sorry state of affairs. For anyone wishing to gain a greater understanding of our place in the universe and to feel a part of something special. Please don't go to church. Go to a community center or join a local sports team.

Read the Article

The Right to be Wrong

From USA Today is an article on Religious Freedoms that I thought was particularly interesting.

America has a complex and enduring commitment to pluralism. We want people to be free to act — and believe — as they please. But we must all play in the same sandbox, so we are attentive to the idiosyncrasies of our playmates, especially when they don't make sense to us.

Few idiosyncrasies are more perplexing than the ways people connect science and religion. Widespread rejection of evolution, to take a familiar example, has created a crisis in education, and it now appears that biology texts might be altered to satisfy anti-evolutionary activists in Texas. Many on the textbook commission believe their religion is incompatible with scientific explanations of origins — evolution and the Big Bang — so they want textbooks with more accommodating theories and different facts.

Tufts University philosopher and leading atheist Daniel Dennet no doubt finds all this mystifying, since he thinks seminary education should ultimately terminate one's faith: "Anybody who goes through seminary and comes out believing in God hasn't been paying attention," he toldThe Boston Globe.

Dennet's brother-in-arms, atheist Jerry Coyne, raked Brown University cell biologist Ken Miller and me over the coals in The New Republic for our claims that Christians can unapologetically embrace science. The only faiths compatible with science, wrote Coyne, are "Pantheism and some forms of Buddhism" — hardly encouraging since few Americans embrace either of these. Coyne wrote that "90% of Americans" hold religious beliefs that "fall into the 'incompatible' category."

The 90% of Americans holding beliefs incompatible with science include Charles Townes and William Phillips, who won Nobel Prizes in physics in 1964 and 1997, respectively. What sort of atheist complains that a fellow citizen doing world-class science must abandon his or her religion to be a good scientist?

Our commitment to pluralism and individual freedom should motivate generosity in such matters and allow people "the right to be wrong," especially when the beliefs in question do not interfere with us. Nothing is gained by loud, self-promoting and mean-spirited assaults on the beliefs of fellow citizens.

I still think that Religion encroaches on other freedoms too much to get its knickers in a twist just yet, but there should be some restraint from bullying people for having a view of the world that cannot be scientifically proven.

Read the Article

Draw Muhammad Day (First Annual)

The Internet: Where religions come to die

Kind of speaks for itself, but don't take my word on this... please watch this video and if you think its worth the effort, send it on to a friend.