Science Duck: The Huffington Post has a soft spot for pseudoscience

Mild mannered blogger PZ Myers over at Pharyngula recently labeled the Huffington Post a “stronghold of anti-scientific, anti-medicine woo.” I often check in with HuffPo for political commentary, so was bummed to see the litany of anti-science crimes that HuffPo has committed. Is it really the case that the Huffington Post gives blank checks to peddlers of pseudoscience? It seems so. Here are the numbers:

Method: A search was conducted for the word ‘homeopathic’ using the search box on three online news outlets’ web sites: The Huffington Post, NPR, and Fox News. The term ‘homeopathic’ was chosen because homeopathy is well established as a pseudoscientific practice that is now taking a serious beating in the UK, as physicians are calling for it to be removed from NHS coverage. The number of news stories containing the word ‘homeopathic’ were tallied for each news outlet, and each story was rated as to if it contained a favorable, unfavorable or neutral view of homeopathy.

Results:

• Fox news returned a total of 20 news stories; 5% were favorable towards homeopathy, 50% were unfavorable, and 45% were neutral.
• NPR returned a total of 8 news stories; 12.5% were favorable towards homeopathy, 50% were unfavorable, and 37.5% were neutral.
• The Huffington Post returned a total of 77 news stories; 68.83% were favorable toward homeopathy, 14.28% were unfavorable, and 16.88% were neutral.

Conclusion: Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that homeopathy is junk science, the Huffington Post appears to bias their ‘reporting’ to portray it as a valid medical practice. Both NPR and (even) FoxNews appear to err on the side of truth, and usually produce either neutral or completely honest accounts of homeopathy. Granted, HuffPo is a strange combination of proper news reporting and random bloggers’ opinions, so we should expect more woo to crop up. But it’s not a free-for-all either: their blog posts are in fact edited to fit their editorial guidelines. They’ve at least allowed a couple level-headed bloggers to post rational/evidence based discussions of homeopathy (e.g., Steven Newton, David Brenders), but give a much bigger soapbox to pet homeopaths and anti-science folks like Dana Ullman

Read the Article

New Threats to Freedom

Back in 2005, Chris Lee, a student at Washington State University, set out to make a comedy musical that, in the tradition of South Park, offended as broad a spectrum of people as possible. Unfortunately for him, he succeeded. His musical--a very loose parody of Mel Gibson's 2004 film The Passion of the Christ--earned him protests, death threats, and even an organized attempt among administrators and students to disrupt the play.

Today, my organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, unveils a new video about Chris' strange journey:

You can see all the documentation about this case yourself here, including the e-mail in which the Washington State University administrator admits that they counseled students to stand up and yell during the play. While the university did not advise the students to shout threats of physical violence and even death threats during the play, that's what the protesters did. Meanwhile, the campus police told Chris they would not protect the actors if the angry protesters decided to rush the stage. Amazingly, the president of WSU actually praised the university-funded, threat-shouting, play-disrupting students, saying they "exercised their rights of free speech in a very responsible manner."

Read the Article